1. The court below was quite right in directing that police assistance should be made available for the purpose of implementing the injunction order granted by the court earlier. It is seen from the affidavit filed by the respondent before the court below that in I.A. No. 476 of 1989 the respondent had succeeded in obtaining an order of injunction absolute against the petitioners. In spite of it, according to the respondent, the petitioners interfered with her possession of the property and it was under those circumstances that the respondent was obliged to seek the protection of the police through court for giving effect to the order of injunction obtained in I.A. No. 476 and the court below granted the request of the respondent. By ordering the police help to the respondent, the court below had merely taken the follow-up steps to implement its earlier order of injunction. When the court finds that a litigant who had secured an order from court is not in a position to have its full benefit owing either to obstruction or non-cooperation of the other side, it is always open to the court to resort to the law enforcement machinery to see that its order is obeyed and there i