1. We regret that we cannot accept the contentions of the appellant as we find no error committed by Bakthavatsalam, J., in coming to the conclusion that a writ will not lie against the respondents herein for the redressal of his grievances. We may here, before referring to the facts of this case, pick up the thread from a Full Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of The Mayavaram Financial Corporation Ltd., Mayiladuthurai v. The Registrar of Chits, Pondicherry 2, in which this Court has held as follows:

“The Hon‘ble the Chief Justice has the inherent power to allocate the Judicial business of the High Court including who of the Judges should sit alone and who should constitute the Bench of two or more Judges. No litigant shall, upon such constitution of a Bench or allotment of a case to a particular Judge of the Court will have a right to question the jurisdiction of the Judges or the Judge hearing the case. No person can claim as a matter of right that his petition be heard ‘ by a single Judge or a Division Bench or a Particular single Judge or a particular Divisional Bench. No Judge or a Bench of Judges will assume Jurisdiction unless the case is allotted to him or