High Court of Judicature at Madras
KAILASAM & MAHARAJAN
D.P.F. Textiles Private Ltd. Mettupalayam Ro.ad, Coimbatore
Versus
The Town Panchayat Vellakinar, Coimbatore District, represented by its Executive Officer & Others
W.A. No. 469 of 1971
Decided On :Decided on: 29-04-1974
PANCHAYAT - HOUSE TAX - LEVY ON ANNUAL RENTAL VALUE - POWER OF PANCHAYAT - MADRAS PANCHAYATS ACT (X OF 1950), SS. 63, 64 - MADRAS PANCHAYATS ACT (XXXV OF 1958), S. 120(1) - RULES FRAMED UNDER S. 120(1) - INTERPRETATION - SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, a textile company, challenged the levy of house tax by the panchayat on the basis of annual rental value, arguing that the panchayat lacked the authority to do so. The panchayat had previously levied the tax based on the capital value of the building, but in 1967, it adopted the annual rental value as the sole basis for assessment.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the panchayat did not have the power to levy the house tax on the basis of annual rental value because the Government had not framed rules under the proviso to S. 120(1) of the Madras Panchayats Act, 1958, empowering all panchayats to adopt that method of assessment. The court noted that the rules framed by the Government only prescribed the manner of ascertaining the annual or capital value of houses, but did not authorize all panchayats to adopt either method for fixing the house tax payable.
Issues: 1. Whether the panchayat had the power to levy the house tax on the basis of annual rental value? 2. Whether the Government had framed rules under S. 120(1) of the Madras Panchayats Act, 1958, empowering all panchayats to adopt the annual rental value as the basis for assessment?
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted S. 120(1) of the Madras Panchayats Act, 1958, and the rules framed thereunder, and held that the panchayat could not adopt the annual rental value as the basis for assessment because the Government had not framed rules specifically authorizing all panchayats to do so. The court noted that the rules only prescribed the manner of ascertaining the annual or capital value of houses, but did not confer the power to adopt either method for fixing the house tax payable.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appellant's challenge to the levy of house tax on the basis of annual rental value and directed the panchayat to re-consider the assessment on the basis of the gross capital value. The court also granted the appellant three months' time from the date of the judgment to pay the tax as directed.
(KAILASAM, J.)
1. This appeal is preferred by the D.P.F. Textiles, Private Limited, Coimbatore, against the judgment of a single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 2982 of 1969. The only question that was raised by the learned counsel, Mr. R.G. Rajan, is that the Panchayat in question is not competent to levy the house tax on the basis of annual rental value.
2. The facts that are necessary for the purpose of this case may be set out. The appellant was assessed to a tax of Rs. 989-55p for the period from the second half-year of 1956 to the first half year of 1961-1962. For the second half-year of 1961-1962, the assessment was increased to Rs. 2882-25p. The appellant filed a suit O.S. No. 734 of 1962 in the District Munsifs Court, Coimbatore, in which the assessment was reduced by 10 per cent. On appeal, the appellant succeeded and the extra levy was set aside and the judgment of the appellate Court was confirmed in Second Appeal No. 177 of 1966. For the year 1964-1965 the Panchayat levied a tax of Rs. 5,938-45p., but it was subsequently reduced to Rs. 1,979-10p. From the year 1956 to the year 1964-1965, the basis of the levy of the house tax was on the capital value of the building. In the year 1967, the panchayat adopted only the annual rental value as the basis and on 17th October, 1967, fixed the tax payable by the appellant for the year as Rs. 15,720. An appeal to the Town Panchayat failed and the tax at Rs. 15,720 was confirmed.
3. Aggrieved at this order, the appellant challenged the levy before this court by way of a writ petition. The main contention raised by the appellant before the learned single Judge was that the Panchayat acted beyond its powers in adopting the annual rental value as the basis of the tax. The other two questions that were raised by him were that the Panchayat did not apply its mind to the directions given by the authorities when it adopted the annual rental value, and therefore, the levy was illegal. It is unnecessary to refer to the second contention or to the other contention as the learned counsel confined himself only to the question as to the power of the Panchayat to adopt the annual rental value for fixing the house-tax payable by it.
4. In order to appreciate this contention, Ss. 63 and 64 of the Madras Act X of 1950 may be referred to S. 63 empowers every Panchayat to levy in the village a house-tax, a professional tax and a vehicle tax. S. 64(1) provides that the house-tax referred to in S. 63(1) shall be levied on a house in the village on any one of the following basis, viz, (a) annual value, (b) capital value or (c) such other basis as may be prescribed. As Ss. 63 and 64 of Act X of 1950 stood, there could be no, doubt that the Panchayat could levy the tax on any one of the three basis viz., on annual value, capital value or such other basis as may be prescribed. When Madras Act XXXV of 1958 was passed, S. 120(1) was enacted, which runs as follows:
“The house-tax shall be levied on all houses in every village and town on the basis on which such tax was levied in the local area concerned immediately before the commencement of this Act;
Provided that the Government may by rules prescribe that the tax shall be levied on the basis of classified plinth area or on the basis of annual rent value or capital value or on a combination of any two or more of the above basis.”
While Sub-S. (1) of S. 120 enacts that the house-tax shall be levied on the basis on which the tax was levied immediately before the commencement of the Act, the proviso enables the Government to frame rules prescribing that the tax shall be levied on the basis of classified plinth area or on the basis of annual rental value or capital value or on a combination on of any two or more of the above, bases. The effect of these provisions is that the method adopted by the Panchayat shall continue till rules are framed by the Government. The Government are empowered to prescribe that the Panchayat may adopt any one o
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.