(RAMAPRASADA RAO, J.):

1. The subject matter In this Civil Revision Petition presents at once an inconvenient and a provocative situation. It is inconvenient for the reason that many of the High Courts other than our High Court, excepting a single judge of oar court, have taken a view different from the one we intend taking, and it is provocative because this case is responsible for us to give notice to the Advocates Association, to the Bar Association and to the Women Lawyers Association end on the top of its request a senior counsel like Mr. K. Parasaran to be oar Amicus curiae to assist us to solve out certain apparent riddles which the case confronts us with.

2. The facts are very simple. The petitioner-plaintiff filed O.S. No. 518 of 1978 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif, Tirupathur, North Arcot District and contemporaneously filed I.A. No. 2382 of 1973, and sought for i an ed Interim temporary injunction against the respondents defendants or their agents restraining them from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said property. On 24th November, 1975, the learned District Munsiff passed an order to the following effect:

“Ad inte