SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Mad) 103

ISMAIL
D. Akkamma (died) – Appellant
Versus
P. Kannamma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:A. Nagarajan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:S. Nainarsundaram & V. Natarajan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

1. The plaintiff In O.S. No. 1280 of 1966 on the file of the City Civil Court, Madras, who lost in part before the courts below, is the appellant herein. The suit was instituted by the appellant for recovery of possession of the portion marked “A” and “Koodam” in the plaint plan, for permanent injunction restraining the respondents-defendant from interfering with the appellants possession regarding the other portions of the suit premises and for future mesne profits. The appellant succeeded before the Trial Court as well as the first appellate court except with regard to the portions marked “A” and “Koodam” in the plaint plan and with regard to that property the appellants suit was dismissed. There is not much of controversy with regard to the facts of this case. There was a suit, O.S. No. 532 of 1958 on the file of the City Civil Court, Madras which was for partition. Since the property could not be divided between all the persons entitled to the same, the same was sold In court auction on 18th, August 1963 and the appellant purchased the said property. She obtained the sale certificate on 9th October 1963. Thereafter she instituted the present suit for recovery of poss










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top