SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Mad) 228

RATNAM, RAMAPRASADA RAO
J. K. Sayani – Appellant
Versus
Bright Brothers Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:D. Madanchand Chopda, D. Trilokchand Chopda, V. Srinivasan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

Ramaprasada Rao, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment of Ismail, J. now reported in Bright Brothers Ltd. v. J. K. Sayani, AIR 1976 Mad 55. The plaintiff in O. S. No. 4905 of 1968, an the file of t he City Civil - Court, Madras, is the appellant before us. The plaintiff-appellant entered into an arrangement with the defendants respondents under which the plaintiff appellant became the sole selling agents of the respondents with regard to a specified area. It is admitted that the said arrangement did not prescribe any particular period during which the said agency should be in vogue. The plaintiff was purchasing the goods from the respondents from time to time as well as booking orders for the sale of the respondents goods. A commission of 6. 112 per cent was to be paid by the respondents to the appellant in respect of such dealings. An extra commission of 1. 1/2 per cent was also provided for in certain circumstances. Under Ex. A. 44, dated 27-2-1964, though there were certain modifications regarding the percentage of commission and the circumstances under which such entitlement as to commission by the appellant could be claimed, there wa













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top