SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 578

K.SAMPATH
Kamalammal – Appellant
Versus
Indirani Ammal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:K. Doraiswami, Advocate. For the Respondent:D. Vijay, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. Plaintiffs are the appellants. They filed suit O.S. No. 1273/80 before the District Munsif of Poonamallee for a permanent injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the suit property except by due process of law. Their case was that the property originally belonged to one Munuswami Mudaliar, that the first appellant was his legally wedded wife and other appellants were their children, that the respondent was the daughter of the first wife of the said Munuswami Mudaliiar, that the said Munuswami Mudaliar was living with the appellant in the A Schedule house till his death in the year 1974, that after his death, the appellant continued to live there, that the respondent claiming the whole of the A schedule property under a registered settlement deed dated 203.1950 sent a notice dated 20.4.1974 calling upon the appellants to quit and deliver vacant possession, that the appellants resisted the claim of the respondents title, to the whole of A schedule property and claimed title in themselves in respect of the entire property, that the respondent though entitled to claim title and recovery of possession of the whole A Sche









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top