SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Mad) 484

KRISHNASWAMY REDDY
. – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ramalingam, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Sundaravaradan and K.S. Ahmed, Advocates.

Judgment :-

(1) THIS appeal has been filed by defendants 1 to 3 in O. S. No. 29 of 1959 on the file of the Sub-Court, Chingleput, against the order passed in I. A. 73 of 1969 by the Subordinate Judge appointing a Commissioner for making enquire regarding the quantum of mesne profits payable by defendants 1 to 3.

(2) THE plaintiff who is the respondent herein filed a suit for partition and separate possession of her 1/6th share in the suit properties. A preliminary decree was passed on 14-3-1962 declaring that the plaintiff was entitled to a 1/6th share in the suit properties. Clause 6 of the preliminary decree inter alia provided that the plaintiffs share in future mesne profits would be determined in the final decree proceedings. A final decree was passed on 28-2-1964. Clause 12 of the said decree provided that the question of mesne profits is left to be decided in a separate proceedings while the other matters provided under the preliminary decree were settled under the final decree.

(3) THE plaintiff filed an application under Order 20, Rule 12, C. P. C. to hold an enquiry in regard to mesne profits. This application was resisted by the defendants on the main ground that as the f





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top