MAHESWARAN
T. V. Rathnam (deceased) – Appellant
Versus
P. Janakiraman – Respondent
1. These two revisions are filed by the tenant, one against the order of the Appellate Authority in R.C.A. 412 of 1982 fixing the fair rent at Rs. 691 per month and another against an order dismissing M.P. 744 of 1982. for adducing additional evidence. Pending these revisions which were filed in the year 1982. and admitted by this Court, the revision petitioner, Mrs. T.V. Ratnam, died. She died on 17th October, 1984. The brother of the deceased revision petitioner in his affidavit would say that the legal representatives of the deceased revision petitioner and he came to know only on 19th December, 1984 that the revisions are pending in High Court and that they have to bring on record the legal representatives. In the circumstances, they pray for condoning the delay in bringing the legal representatives on record and also to set aside the abatement.
2. The Office, in its Note, says that there is no provision in the Rent Control Act, to condone the delay in bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased party.
3. Both the revisions, I must point out, are filed under S. 25 of the Tamil Nadu Act 18 of 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1973 and Act 1 of 1903. The Ren
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.