SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Mad) 243

MAHESWARAN
T. V. Rathnam (deceased) – Appellant
Versus
P. Janakiraman – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Gandhi for Petrs.
K. Thangavelu for Respt.

Judgment :-

1. These two revisions are filed by the tenant, one against the order of the Appellate Authority in R.C.A. 412 of 1982 fixing the fair rent at Rs. 691 per month and another against an order dismissing M.P. 744 of 1982. for adducing additional evidence. Pending these revisions which were filed in the year 1982. and admitted by this Court, the revision petitioner, Mrs. T.V. Ratnam, died. She died on 17th October, 1984. The brother of the deceased revision petitioner in his affidavit would say that the legal representatives of the deceased revision petitioner and he came to know only on 19th December, 1984 that the revisions are pending in High Court and that they have to bring on record the legal representatives. In the circumstances, they pray for condoning the delay in bringing the legal representatives on record and also to set aside the abatement.

2. The Office, in its Note, says that there is no provision in the Rent Control Act, to condone the delay in bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased party.

3. Both the revisions, I must point out, are filed under S. 25 of the Tamil Nadu Act 18 of 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1973 and Act 1 of 1903. The Ren




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top