The tenant within the meaning of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, hereinafter referred to as the Act, is the petitioner in this revision. The landlord within the meaning of the Act is the respondent herein. The landlord sought the eviction of the tenant under section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the Act on the ground that he requires the promises in question for the purpose of his paper business. There is no dispute that the tenant himself is carrying on a match factory industry in the premises in question. The parties placed their evidence before the Controller and the Controller on assessment of the same did not countenance the case of the landlord and dismissed the petition for eviction. The landlord appealed and the Appellate Authority came to a different conclusion and ordered eviction of the tenant. This revision is directed against the orders of the Appellate Authority.

2. Considering the submissions made by Mr.M.Srinivasan, learned Counsel appearing for the tenant/petitioner herein, I do not feel obliged to dwell in detail over the merits of the same, since I am impressed that the relevant factors which ought to have weighed with the Appellate Auth