S.SWAMIKKANNU
C. Dhandayutham – Appellant
Versus
M. Natarajan and others – Respondent
The second plaintiff in O.S.No. 239 of 1981 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Palani, is the petitioner herein. I.A.No.1054 of 1983 in O.S.No.239 of 1981 was filed under Order 23, Rule 1-A and section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, by the second plaintiff for transposing him as a defendant in the suit. Order 23, Rule 1-A Civil Procedure Code which was inserted by the Amending Act 104 of 1976 reads as follows:
"Where a suit is withdrawn or abandoned by a plaintiff under Rule 1 and a defendant applies to be transposed as a plaintiff under Rule 10 of Order 1 the Court shall, in Considering such application, have due regard to the question whether the application has a substantial question to be decided as against any of the other defendants."
A careful reading of the above provision shows that it is only the defendant who can transpose himself as plaintiff. But in the instant case, the revision petitioner prays for his transposition as defendant in the suit. In the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No. 1054 of 1983 the second defendant has stated that O.S.No.239 of 1981 had been filed originally by him and the first plaintiff, against the first defendant who is a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.