SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Mad) 174

V.RATNAM
Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
Natesa Achari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.Krishnan, for Appellant.
S.V.Jayaraman, for Respondent.

Judgment :-

These appeals at the instance of the tenant have beers preferred against the common judgment in A.S.Nos.108 of 1981 and 129 of 1981, District Court, South Arcot at Cuddalore. The Respondent in these Appeals (hereinafter referred to as the landlord) is the owner of the building bearing No.158, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Villupuram. The first floor of this building comprising of 24 rooms was leased to the tenant originally in 1967 and the lease was subsequently renewed and finally, on 1.7.1979, a lease deed was executed. That lease deed mentions that in addition to the first floor of the building, the cots, electric fans, chairs, tables and other items of furniture and some utensils, a three horse power electric pumpset and certain other articles also formed part of the tease and that the premises was to be used for the purpose of running a lodging house by the tenant. The period of the lease as finally renewed was from 3.7.1979 to 31.3.1980. After the expiry of the said period, the landlord declined to accept the rent from the tenant and demanded by a notice, delivery of possession. Thereupon, the tenant filed O.S.No.5 of 1981, Sub Court, Cuddalore, for a declaration t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top