T.N.SINGARAVELU
M. M. Hameed Marican – Appellant
Versus
M. Mohammed Idress Marican and others – Respondent
The plaintiff in the suit the revision petitioner herein. He has filed the suit to remove the first respondent as’ the Trustee of a certain Trust and for appointment of a new Trustee including himself with consequential reliefs. The plaintiff paid court-fee of Rs.200 under the residuary section 50 of the Pondicherry Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1972. This was objected to by the other side and the trial court took up the court-fee as the preliminary issue and held that the suit instituted by the plaintiff is not for a mere declaration and that section 50 of the Pondicherry Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1972, will have no application in this case. Consequently, the plaintiff was directed to pay additional court-fee computed on Rs.21,59,375 as per the rate prescribed under section 28 of the Pondicherry Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1972. The plaintiff is aggrieved by this order and has come on revision.
2. I have heard learned Counsel on both sides and perused the pleadings. It is clear that the petitioner-plaintiff is only a beneficiary and not a trustee himself. The relief asked for is for the removal of the present trustee on the ground of mismanagement
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.