SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Mad) 352

M.N.CHANDURKAR
S. Muthuswamy – Appellant
Versus
Periaswami Moopan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T.R. Venkataraman for Petr. Respondent did not appear.

Judgment :-

1. This is a revision petition under section 6-B of the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955, against the order of the Special Deputy Collector, Thiruchirappatli.

2. It is not in dispute, the petitioner-landlord filed an application under section 3 (4) (a) of the said Act and that the respondent-tenant admitted that he was in arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 2208.75. The tenant was directed to deposit the said amount and produce the challan in Court on or before 26-1-1981. The tenant admittedly did not deposit the said amount within the time and an order of eviction was passed.

3. When proceedings to take possession were taken by the landlord and a notice was given to the tenant, the respondent offered to 13th March, 1982 pay the entire balance of rent. He was directed to deposit the amount in the State Bank of India which he did and be produced a challan on 16th March, 1982. On 17th March, 1982 the Special Deputy Collector made an order that the arrears of rent have been deposited and therefore, “full settlement was recorded” and the case was closed terminating the E.P. This order is challenged by the landlord.

4. The tenant-respondent has been served, bu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top