VENKATASWAMI, ABDUL HADI
B. K. Tara – Appellant
Versus
B. N. Kannan – Respondent
This civil miscellaneous appeal by the wife is against the decree for dissolution of marriage granted by the Court below under S. 13(1-A)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act in H.M.O.P. No. 474 of 1989 filed by the respondent-husband in the court below, viz., the Family Court, Madras. No doubt, the grounds of cruelty and desertion by the wife were also alleged in the said original petition. But, decree has been granted only on the the ground alleged under the abovesaid S. 13(1-A)(ii) of the abovesaid Act, viz., that there has been no restitution of conjugal rights between the said parties to the marriage ever since 16.6.1987, when the decree for restitution of conjugal rights was given in R.C. No. 205 of 1985 filed by the petitioner-wife in the Family Court, Bangalore till the date when the abovesaid H.M.O.P. No. 474 of 1989 was filed, viz., 16.5.1989. The learned Judge of the Family Court, Madras found in his judgment that admittedly, there was no restitution of conjugal rights between the abovesaid spouses after the passing of the abovesaid decree for restitution of conjugal rights on 16.5.1987. As per the abovesaid provision in S. 13(1-A)(ii) of the abovesaid Act, if there
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.