VENKATASWAMI, ABDUL HADI
N. Balasubramanian – Appellant
Versus
V. Chitra – Respondent
ABDUL HADI, J.
1. Pursuant to the office note the abovesaid C.R.P. S.R. is posted before us regarding its maintainability.
2. The abovesaid proceedings by the husband is against the order in I.A. No. 732 of 1991, granting interim maintenance under S. 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending the main litigation viz. O.P. 758 of 1991 on the file of the Additional Judge, Family Court filed by the respondent-wife for dissolving the marriage between the said parties on the ground of cruelty.
3. This proceeding is sought to be filed under S. 19(1) of the Family Courts Act. No doubt S. 19 of the Family Courts Act has undergone change by virtue of the Family Courts (Amendment) Act 1991 (Central Act No. 59 of 1991) and the said amendment has come into force on 28-12-1991. But the said amendment does not in any way alter the abovesaid sub-S. (1) of S. 19 of the said Act. The said sub-S. (1) while providing that an appeal shall lie from every judgment or order of a Family Court to this court says that such an appeal shall not lie if the order in question is an interlocutory order. The abovesaid order passed in I.A. No. 732 of 1991 directing the petitioner husband to pay Rs. 500/- per m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.