SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 4978

R.S.RAMANATHAN
Sandhiya – Appellant
Versus
D. Gunasekaran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:T. Dhanyakumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:V.S. Siva Sundaram, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner/wife. The respondent/husband filed a petition in G.O.P.No.136 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Cuddalore, for appointing him as a guardian for all his three minor children and for their custody. It is stated in the said petition filed by the respondent/husband that the petitioner/wife herein had taken away the children with her without the knowledge of the respondent/husband and already the respondent/husband filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.26 of 2009 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Panruti, for restitution of conjugal rights and that petition was ordered on 12.2.2010. Even thereafter, the wife/petitioner herein did not obey the order of the Court. Therefore, the petition in G.O.P.No.136 of 2010, was filed to appoint the respondent/husband as the guardian of the minors.

2. Mr. T.Dhayakumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that as per the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 the Court, where the majors are residing will have the jurisdiction and admittedly, the minors are residing with the mother at Villupuram, and therefore, the District Court, Cuddal






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top