D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
Glory Bai – Appellant
Versus
S. K. A. Noorjakan Beevi – Respondent
An interesting question of law that arises in the appeal is, whether the unfortunate parents, who lost their married daughter in a road accident, are entitled to compensation for the death of their daughter.
2. In this case, the daughter of the appellant - parents, her husband, her minor son, her mother-in-law, her brother-in-law (husbands brother) and his wife travelled in an Ambassador Car. The ill-fated Car had a head on collision with a tourist bus on 15.03.2002. In that accident, the aforesaid entire family members died. One vehicle was registered with the second respondent - Insurance Company at Ramanathapuram and another vehicle was insured with the same Insurance Company at Nagercoil. The father of the son-in-law of the appellants (since the mother of the son-in-law also died in the accident) claimed compensation and he was granted compensation for the loss of his son. But, the same yardstick was not applied when the appellants herein claimed compensation for the loss of their daughter. Their M.C.O.P.No.940 of 2002 was rejected by the Tribunal on the ground that they were not the legal representatives after marriage and that after marriage, the heirs of the dece
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.