V. PERIYA KARUPPIAH.,J

1. Theappeal in O.S.A.No.88 of 2011 is preferred by the applicant in A.No.1600 of 2011 in C.S.No.7 of 2011 against the order of the learned single Judge dated 21.03.2011 in negativating the claim of the petitioner to recall the Order dated 8.3.2011 invalidating all the votes polled at District Court Campus at Nagercoil and Padmanabapuram and direct the Judge-Commissioner to count the votes polled at District Court campus at Nagercoil and Padmanabapuram.

2. Theappellant in O.S.A.No.98 of 2011 is the third party and a contesting candidate belonging to the said Bar who was permitted by us to prefer the Appeal against the order passed by the learned single Judge.

3. The appeal in O.S.A.No.98 of 2011 is directed against the order passed by the learned single Judge in A.No.78 of 2011 in C.S.No.7 of 2011 dated 8.3.2011 in invalidating the entire votes polled in the ballet box of Padmanabapuram Bar Election invoking Rule 25(2) of Bar Council of Tamil Nadu Rules.

4. Thelearned counsel for the appellant in O.S.A.No.88 of 2011 would submit in his argument that the first respondent/plaintiff has filed the suit with four prayers, but they have been granted by