The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition challenging the order of dismissal passed by the second respondent dated 26.03.2010 and the order passed by the first respondent, the appellant authority, dated 26.05.2010, confirming the order of the second respondent.

2. The petitioner was appointed as a police constable in the year 2008. Certain charges have been leveled against him. After framing charges and after holding enquiry, he was dismissed from service by the order of the second respondent dated 26.03.2010. The petitioner preferred an appeal before the first respondent raising more than nine grounds. While so, without considering the grounds raised by the petitioner, the first respondent has passed the impugned order dated 26.05.2010 confirming the order of the second respondent. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition challenging those orders.

3. The learnedcounsel appearing for the petitioner mainly contended that the appellate authority, namely, the first respondent has passed a non-speaking order without dealing with the grounds raised in the appeal preferred before him. Hence, according to the learned counsel appearing for the p