SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 5165

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JAICHANDREN
N. Srirangan
Versus
The Commissioner, Salem Corporation, Salem & Another
W.P.No.2660 of 2010
Decided On :12-02-2010

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:S. Sugendran, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R1, K. Sridharan, Advocate. R2, R. Murali, Government Advocate.

The importance of providing necessary particulars for the disposal of representations and the court's power to direct the consideration of representations upon the production of necessary particulars.

Headnote:

mandamus - disposal of representation - The court directed the petitioner to furnish necessary particulars for the disposal of the representation, and upon doing so, the first respondent was directed to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders expeditiously.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 18.01.2010.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the petitioner to furnish necessary particulars for the disposal of the representation, and upon doing so, the first respondent was directed to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders expeditiously.

Issues: The main issue was the disposal of the petitioner's representation and the necessity for furnishing necessary particulars for the same.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of providing necessary particulars for the disposal of representations and directed the first respondent to consider the representation upon the petitioner producing the necessary particulars.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the direction for the petitioner to furnish necessary particulars, and the first respondent to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders expeditiously.

Judgment :-

This writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 18.01.2010.

2. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent had submitted that the petitioner has not furnished the necessary particulars for disposal of the representation, dated 18.01.2010, on merits and in accordance with law.

3. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the first respondent, it is made clear that it is open to the first respondent to direct the petitioner to furnish all the necessary particulars relating to the representation made by the petitioner, on 18.01.2010. On the petitioner producing the necessary particulars, as required by the first respondent, the first respondent shall consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 18.01.2010 and pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible.

4. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top