SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 1073

S.MANIKUMAR
National Insurance Company Limited, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
P. Thalamma & Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:N. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:M. Malar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. It is the case of the Respondents/Claimants that the deceased was employed by the Fifth Respondent herein, M. Far Constructions Private Limited, Chennai as a Coolie. On 13.4.2006, at about 10.30 hours, when he was unloading the sand bags from the fourth floor, he fell down through the gap in between the hoist unloading ramp and scaffolding pipe to the ground floor at the project site of “The Pacific City” at Chennai, under the sub contract of Mr. G. Appanna, who was engaged by the first opposite party. As a result, he sustained grievous injuries and was immediately rushed to Government General Hospital, Chennai for treatment. But he died on the same day.

2. A case was registered in T-4, Madhuravayal Police Station, Ambattur Taluk, Chennai vide FIR No.613 of 2006, dated 13.4.2006. Wife and children claimed compensation of `7,00,000/-. The Appellant/Insurance Company denied the manner of accident and its liability. It was further contended that the accident occurred purely due to the negligence of the deceased, that he did not wear safety gadgets like helmet and safety belt, disobeying the orders of his employer and the rules and conditions. It was further contended th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top