As the petitioner and respondents are common in both petitions and the same question is raised for consideration in both, they can be disposed of by a common order.

2. In these two petitions, the petitioner challenges action of the 2nd respondent in

(i) issuing a letter dated 16.06.2007 calling upon the petitioner who is in America to attend enquiry on the complaint preferred by his since divorced wife Latha Seshadri/ 3rd respondent.

(ii) addressing a letter to the Consul General of India, New York Consulate General of India, America seeking deportation to India of the petitioner.

3. The brief background of the case is as follows:

The petitioner and his then wife/3rd respondent were staying together at the United States of America and had been separated for a period of over two years. The custody of their minor child was with the 3rd respondent. The petitioner had moved the Court of Common Pleas, Division at Domestic Relations, Cuyahoga County, Ohio for divorce. Visitation rights were granted to the petitioner in such proceedings and the petitioner also was directed to effect payment towards the care of the minor child. The 3rd respondent has filed an application in