High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. MURUGESAN
L. Ravindran
Versus
The Commissioner of Police, Egmore & Others
W.P. No. 5677 of 2007
Decided On :22-03-2010
Rowdy List - Police Standing Orders - PSO 746, PSO 747, PSO 748, PSO 749, PSO 776, PSO 778, PSO 779 - The court discussed the provisions of Police Standing Orders (PSO) related to opening and discontinuance of History Sheets and the classification of suspects and rowdies. The court highlighted the requirement of reasonable belief and materials to open a History Sheet, the restrictions on notified offenders, and the need for specific orders for the retention of a History Sheet beyond two years. The judgment emphasized the protection of fundamental rights and the duty of law enforcement agencies to act in strict conformity with the rules.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought the removal of his name from the rowdy list record maintained by the police, contending that he was falsely implicated in a murder case and acquitted. The police had opened a History Sheet against the petitioner based on the alleged involvement in the murder case, despite no other pending cases against him.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the opening of the History Sheet against the petitioner was unjustified as there were no materials to support the belief that he was addicted to or aided and abetted the commission of a crime. The court also noted the failure of the police to follow the prescribed procedures for the retention and closure of History Sheets.
Issues: The issues involved the arbitrary opening of a History Sheet against the petitioner, the infringement of his fundamental rights, and the failure of the police to adhere to the prescribed procedures.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the police must have reasonable belief and materials to open a History Sheet, and must follow the prescribed procedures for retention and closure. The judgment emphasized the protection of fundamental rights and the duty of law enforcement agencies to act in strict conformity with the rules.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to remove the name of the petitioner from the record of History Sheet rowdies maintained by the police.
1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking for a direction to the first respondent, the Commissioner of Police, Chennai to give suitable directions to the third respondent, the Inspector of Police, K-5 Police Station, Peravallore, Chennai to remove the name of the petitioner from the rowdy list record.
2. The Inspector of Police (L & O), K-5, Peravallur Police Station, Chennai addressed the Assistant Commissioner of Police (L & O), Secretariat Colony, Chennai intimating that the petitioner L.Ravindran, who is otherwise known as Ravi alias Ravichandran alias Ravindranath, S/o Lakshmipathy along with two others were involved in a murder case due to group rivalry. A case was registered by K-1 Sembium Police Station and the charge sheet was filed and the trial was conducted before the Second Additional Sessions Court, Chennai in S.C.No.204 of 1994. However, the case ended in acquittal. He further stated that discreet enquiries about all the accused revealed that they were acting as Goondas and never mind to mend their ways. The Assistant Commissioner of Police (L & O), Sembium Range, Madras, by order dated 20.7.98, had ordered as follows:-
"The Inspector of Police/K5 PS
Open Rowdy Sheets for (1) Ravi @ Ravichandran (2) Ravi @ Reddy Ravi (3) Thanigai Mani and watch him till 31.12.98."
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that he was falsely implicated in the murder case and he was acquitted. Except the said case, no other case was either registered or pending against the petitioner. Even during the pendency of trial and after acquittal, he did not involve himself in any activity warranting the respondents to open History Sheet. One stray case of alleged involvement in an offence cannot be a ground to include the petitioners name in the rowdy list.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents. No counter affidavit is filed by the respondents.
5. The following are some of the provisions in the Police Standing Orders relating to opening of History Sheet against a person and they are extracted as follows:-
"PSO 746. Part IV – History Sheets.
(1) Part V (Form No.111) shall contain the History sheets of the persons resident permanently or temporarily in their Station limits who are known or believed to be addicted to or to aid and abet the commission of crime, whether convicted or not, or who are believed to be habitual receivers.
(G.O.Ms.No.364, Home, 15th Feb.1943)
Only sheets Nos.1,3, 7 and 8 are to be maintained in the History Sheet forms in use in Station. Sheet No.9 should also be maintained, if a photograph of the criminal is available.
Note: This sub-paragraph will not affect the History Sheets maintained in Crime Records Bureau.
(2) At the back of Sheet No.1, below item 7, the following descriptive detail should be shown:
Age,
Height,
Complexion, and
Particular marks of identification.
(3) In sheet 8 under heading the "Current doings" entries which are informative and useful based on the facts ascertained both by the Sub-Inspector and his men since the date of last entry, shall be made month-wise for close watch bad characters and quarterly for non-close watch bad characters. Anything of interest coming to notice, in respect of a bad character during a month should be entered then and there, without waiting for the end of the month or the quarter.
(4) The entries in the various columns in the History Sheet should be checked by the Sub-Inspector personally and brought upto-date once a year. The fact of such verification should be certified by him in the column under the "Current doings".
(1) History sheets shall be opened automatically at the time of conviction for persons convicted as under and shall be retained for two years after release from jail. Persons are how convicted Numbers of times convicted Persons released from imprisonment for life under Chapters XII and XVII, Indian Penal Code Professional Prisoners Indian Pen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.