SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Mad) 719

THANGAMANI
N. Damodaran Naicker and Another – Appellant
Versus
Janaki Animal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Ramajagadeesan, for Petitioners.
S.P.L. Palaniappan, for Respondent.

Judgment :

The revision petitioners are the landlords in R.C.O.P.No.2802 of 1984 on the file of IX Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras. They instituted that action against the present respondent for recovery of possession on the ground that she has committed wilful default in payment of rent from September, 1963 till September, 1984. The tenant resisted the action contending that she had paid the rent upto May, 1984. In fact, on 25.7.1984 she had called upon the petitioners to specify the Bank wherein she could deposit the rents. However, the landlord never replied. Learned Rent Controller ordered eviction granting three months time holding that there was wilful default on the part of the tenant. The present respondent took up the matter in appeal before the appellate authority in R.C.A.No.382 of 1986. The appellate authority took the view that non-payment of rent was not wilful and accordingly allowed the appeal and set aside the order of eviction passed by the Rent Controller. And this order is assailed by the landlords in this revision petition.

2. It is the case of the landlords that the tenant has failed to pay rent which is Rs.50 per month from September, 1983 till June, 1984




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top