1. The petitioner was originally appointed as a Tutor in the Department of Tamil in the 1st respondent College in the year 1971. The petitioner appeared for an interview before a Committee-held for the purpose of filling up a post of Assistant Professor in Tamil on 12.7.1975. When the College re-opened on 16.7.1975 after Summer Recess, the Principal of the College, by memo dated 16.7.1975 informed the petitioner that he (Principal) was shocked at the petitioners behaviour towards him on the evening of 12.7.1975 and called upon the petitioner to explain why suitable disciplinary action should not be taken against him for the alleged behaviour of the petitioner towards the Principal, Then again, the Principal by another memo dated 21.7.1975 framed the charges specified therein and called upon the petitioner to submit his explanation. In the preamble portion of the said memo, it is stated that the petitioner was asked to show cause why the Principal should not report to the Management his behaviour for suitable disciplinary action on the charges set forth therein. Later on, the petitioner submitted his explanation on 9.8.1975. Subsequently, the petitioner was informed that