1. The Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar Law University represented by its Registrar is the petitioner. They have come forward to challenge the order dated 18.8.2009 passed by the first respondent.

2. The short question arisesfor consideration is whether the direction issued by the Tamil Nadu State Information Commission, dated 18.8.2009 to the petitioner University directing them to furnish certain information to the applicant, is legally justified.

3. By the impugned, order dated 18.8.2009, the Information Commission directed the university to keep the documents to be perused by the representative of the third respondent, who had sought for certain information from the University, which was declined by them. By its direction, the University was directed to keep the file relating to question Nos.1 and 3 on 24.9.2008 and also to take Photostat copies of pages which the third respondent wanted. They were also directed to permit the third respondent to take Videograph of events while processing question No.4 and also to give information relating to question Nos.2,5 and 6 within one week. The writ petition was admitted on 11.9.2009 and an interim stay was granted.

4. It is the stand