SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 2945

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R. SHIVAKUMAR
A. Ruby w/o Ayyachamy
Versus
The State by its Inspector of Police
M.P.No.1 of 2011 in H.C.P. No.55 of 2011 & M.P.No.1 of 2011 in H.C.P. No.1033 of 2010
Decided On : 22-07-2010

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:M. Palanimuthu, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. P. Kumaresan, Public Prosecutor.

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 provides a special procedure for dealing with children in conflict with the law or in need of care and protection, emphasizing the exclusive power of the Juvenile Justice Board, the duty of magistrates, and the court's power to issue necessary directions in the nature of Writs.

Headnote:

HABEAS CORPUS - CUSTODY OF MINOR GIRLS - JUVENILE JUSTICE (CARE AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN) ACT, 2000 - SECTIONS 6, 7, 8, 9, 32, 39

Fact of the Case:

The mothers of two minor girls filed Habeas Corpus Petitions seeking custody of their respective daughters. The girls expressed unwillingness to go with their mothers, leading the court to direct them to be kept in Government Children’s Home until they attain majority. The mothers subsequently filed petitions seeking restoration of custody and visitation rights.

Finding of the Court:

The court highlighted the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, emphasizing the special procedure for dealing with children in conflict with the law or in need of care and protection. It noted the exclusive power of the Juvenile Justice Board to deal with proceedings relating to juveniles in conflict with the law and the duty of magistrates to forward juveniles to the Competent Authority. The court also emphasized the process for dealing with children in need of care and protection and the power of the court to issue necessary directions in the nature of Writs, including directing the placement of children in Children’s Homes or referring them to the Child Welfare Committee.

Issues: Custody of minor girls, restoration of custody, visitation rights, interpretation and application of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the exclusive power of the Juvenile Justice Board to deal with proceedings relating to juveniles in conflict with the law, the duty of magistrates to forward juveniles to the Competent Authority, and the process for dealing with children in need of care and protection. It also highlighted the court's power to issue necessary directions in the nature of Writs, including directing the placement of children in Children’s Homes or referring them to the Child Welfare Committee.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the petitions, observing that the petitioners could approach the Child Welfare Committee for seeking restoration as contemplated under Section 39 of the Act, including visitation rights.

Judgment :

C. Nagappan, J.

1. The mother of minor Deepa, namely Mrs. Jyothi, filed Habeas Corpus Petition in H.C.P. No.55 of 2011 seeking production of the minor girl before the Court and for handing over the custody of the minor to her. The said minor Deepa was produced before this Court on 08.01.2011 and during enquiry in the Court, she said she was not willing to go with her mother, namely the Petitioner and this Court directed minor Deepa be kept in Government Children’s Home, Purasaiwalkam High Road, Kellys, Chennai till she attains majority. Thereafter, her mother Jyothi has filed the present Miscellaneous Petition (M.P.No.1 of 2011 in H.C.P.No.55/2011) seeking for restoration of the custody of the minor girl with her.

2. The mother of minor Ishwarya, namely Mrs. A. Ruby filed Habeas Corpus Petition in H.C.P. No.1033 of 2010 seeking production of minor Ishwarya in the Court and for handing over the custody of minor Ishwarya to her. Minor Ishwarya was produced before this Court on 22.7.2010 and during enquiry minor Ishwarya said she was not willing to go with her mother, namely the Petitioner. Consequently, this Court directed minor Ishwarya to be kept in Government Children’s Home, Purasaiwalkam High Road, Kellys, Chennai till she attains majority. Thereafter, her mother Ruby has filed the present Miscellaneous Petition (M.P.No.1 of 2011 in H.C.P.No.1033/2010) seeking visitation rights during the minor’s stay at the said home.

3. We heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners in both the Miscellaneous Petitions and Mr. P. Kumaresan, learned Public Prosecutor representing the state.

4. Time and again we have come across orders passed by the learned Magistrates directly sending the juvenile in conflict with law to Observation Homes. We have also noticed a number of orders of the learned Magistrates directing the victims, who happened to be minors to be kept in the Observation Homes or Children’s Homes.

5. In the Habeas Corpus Petitions also where the production of a minor is sough for and on being produced, in the event of the minor not willing to go with the parents/lawful guardians, this Court sends the minor to Children’s Homes. The Petitions now filed seek for restoration as well as visitation rights of the minors who have been ordered to be kept in Homes.

6. In the light of the above, we considered it appropriate to highlight the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 and the Rules thereunder and for that purpose we heard the learned Public Prosecutor at length. The Director of Social Defence, Chennai has filed a report dated 5.4.2011.

7. Being a special enactment, the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 shall have overriding effect with other laws except to the extent expressively saved under the said Act. It contemplates a special procedure for dealing with children whether the child in question is a juvenile in conflict with law or a child in need of care and protection.

8. The following procedure is contemplated under the Act with regard to juvenile in conflict with law, who is alleged to have committed offence and has not completed 18th year of age, as on the date of commission of the offence. Section 6 of the Act gives exclusive power to the Juvenile Justice Board, to deal with all proceedings relating to juveniles in conflict with law. The Juvenile Justice Board comprises of a Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of the First class and two social workers, of whom one shall be woman. Section 4 contemplates constitution of one or more Juvenile Justice Board for every District. According to the Public Prosecutor, each one of the Districts of Tamil Nadu has a Juvenile Justice Board and at present no district has more than one Board. It is needless to say that as on today, there is only one Magistrate in each District who is empowered, as a member of the Board, to exercise the powers of the Board. Section 7 st




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top