1. The Civil Revision Petitioner/16th Defendant/Petitioner has projected this Revision petition as against the order dated 13.12.2007 in I.A.No.1655 of 2006 in O.S.No.123 of 2004 passed by the Learned District Munsif, Tiruppur.

2. The Learned District Munsif, Tiruppur while passing orders in I.A.No.1655 of 2006 in O.S.No.123 of 2004 has among other things observed that the petitioner in the main suit has figured as 16th Defendant and that on her behalf, Advocate Selvi V.Suganthi Parimala has appeared and that the petitioner has signed in the summons and further, the petitioner has signed in the vakalat and in the summons, but, in the vakalat filed in this Application and also in the Application, has affixed her left thumb impression and in the notice sent along with the Application, the petitioner has affixed her signature, etc., Further, the trial Court has also opined that in the suit after full trial, the Judgment has delivered and it cannot be construed as an Exparte Preliminary Decree and therefore, the Application filed by the petitioner to set aside the Exparte Preliminary Decree is not acceptable and further, the petitioner has not assigned proper reasons for th