All the aforesaid criminal revisions have been preferred separately by the petitioners who are accused in the case in C.C.No.10 of 2009 on the file of the Special Judge for CBI cases / IX Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. The petitioners herein have sought an order to call for the records in Crl.M.P.Nos. 400 of 2009, 399 of 2009, 397 of 2009, 398 of 2009, 395 of 2009 and 396 of 2009 in C.C.No.10 of 2009 on the file of the Court below and to set aside the order, dated 21.08.2009, thereby discharge the petitioners / accused from the charges framed against them.

3. Dr.A.E.Chelliah, learned Senior Counsel appearing for all the revision petitioners submitted that the petitioners have established that they are entitled to be discharged from the alleged offence attributed against them by the respondent / prosecution and that they had filed written submission bringing out the hollowness of the prosecution case and the documents referred to by the prosecution, however, the petitions, seeking discharge of the petitioners under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were dismissed by the Court below, without considering the same on merits. The learned Senior C