1. The petitioner in all the three writ petitions is a firm of partnership represented by its Partner styling itself as "Creative Infrastructure".

2. In the first writ petition, i.e. W.P.No.6881 of 2009, the prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to first and second respondents to take action against third and fourth respondents based on their various representations dated 28.7.2007, 16.12.2008, 17.2.2009 and 09.04.2009. When the writ petition came up on 18.4.2009, notice was taken on behalf of respondents 3 and 4. Further, when the matter came up on 22.4.2009, the name of the learned Government Pleader (Puducherry) was directed to be printed in the cause list. Even when that writ petition was pending, the same firm subsequently filed two writ petitions in W.P.Nos.16508 and 16509 of 2009.

3. In W.P.No.16508 of 2009, the prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to first and second respondents to invoke the powers under clause 10.9 of the concession agreement dated 25.1.2006 and substitute the fourth respondent concessionaire with another developer for the implementation of the Karaikal Port development project in public interest.

3. 4. In W.P.No.16509 of 2009, t