M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
Shanmuga Sadachara Servai – Appellant
Versus
Thirugnanam Servai – Respondent
1. Shanmugha Sadachara Servai, the petitioner herein is the plaintiff in O.S.No.31 of 1989 on the file of District Munsif, Kovilpatti. He filed the suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction. After trial, the said suit was dismissed. Though he instructed his lawyer to file an appeal after getting the copies of the judgment and decree, the copy application was not filed in time. Therefore, he engaged some other Lawyer to whom he instructed to file an appeal. In the process of filing the appeal, there was a delay of 94 days. Therefore, the petitioner filed an application in I.A.No.530 of 1991 to condone the said delay under Sec.5 of the Limitation Act. The petitioner examined himself as P.W.1 in the enquiry conducted on this application. The reasons for causing the delay of 94 days were given by P.W.1 in the deposition. He was also cross-examined. After consideration of the materials and submissions of the counsel for both the parties, the court of Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin dismissed the petition on the ground that the details of the dates have not been clearly given either in the petition or in the deposition. This order is being challenged in this revision.
2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.