S.S.SUBRAMANI
M. Kandasamy – Appellant
Versus
U. Baskar – Respondent
1. Judgment-debtor in C.S.No.770 of 1988 on the file of this Court is the revision petitioner.
2. The property was sold on 2.12.1998 and the present application has been filed by petitioner to direct resale of property on the ground that the sale was conducted not in accordance with law and there are so many irregularities. It is mentioned that the sale was conducted on 2.12.1998 and the sale was also confirmed and auction purchaser also made application for getting delivery of the property by filing E.P.No.39 of 1998. It is at that time, present application was filed to have the resale of property and postpone delivery by two weeks.
3. The same was seriously opposed by auction purchaser. In his objection, the maintainability of the petition itself was challenged on the ground that decree-holder was not made as party. It is further stated that various contentions in the petition are not true and he has deposited the entire amount within the time stipulated under law.
4. By the impugned order, application of judgment-debtor was dismissed.
5. I heard the learned counsel for revision petition.
6. One of the main reason for dismissing the application is that decree-holder who
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.