S.ASHOK KUMAR
S. Viajayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Sekar – Respondent
As against the return of the Interlocutory Application filed by the revision petitioner/plaintiff to restore the Execution Petition as not maintainable, this revision has been filed.
2. The plaintiff filed the suit against the first defendant and other officials to restore the bunk shop again in the suit property and to restore the power service connection to the bunk shop. The case of the petitioner is that she is a physically challenged woman aged 32 years and unmarried. She was running a bunk shop which was originally run by her father from the year 1960. Since her father became old, she has been running the bunk shop from 1972 onwards.; She is eking out the livelihood for seven members of her family with the meagre income derived therefrom. She has been paying regular monthly charges of electricity consumption. According to the plaintiff there are about 10 bunk shops in the said area and most of them affecting the free flow of traffic, but the plaintiffs particular shop is not so affecting the traffic. The first defendant while constructing his house influenced the second and third defendants, who removed the plaintiffs bunk shop illegally and thrown out the plainti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.