M.VENUGOPAL
Vijayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Sulochana (deceased) – Respondent
1. The Appellant/Respondent/Defendant has filed this Second Appeal as against the Judgment and Decree dated 23.08.1995 in A.S.No.6 of 1994 on the file of Subordinate Court, Poonamallee.
2. The First Appellate Court viz., the Learned Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee, while passing the Judgment in A.S.No.6 of 1994, dated 23.08.1995 has among other things observed that the Appellant/ Respondent/Defendant has to vacate the land in question and that the Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff is entitled to the recovery of the possession since the Appellant/Respondent/Defendant has made improvements by way of putting the superstructure on the land in question and that the Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff has to pay the value of the house to the Appellant/Respondent/Defendant etc., and moreover, opined that the Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff is entitled to the relief of declaration of the suit property and that she is entitled to the recovery of the possession and further directed the Respondent/ Appellant/Plaintiff to pay the compensation for the superstructure besides directing him to deposit into the Court below the value of the building as on date of filing of Execution Proceedings and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.