A.KULASEKARAN
Kandasamy – Appellant
Versus
Savithri (died) – Respondent
1. Thedefendants are the appellants herein. The first respondent herein/plaintiff had filed a suit in O.S.No.159 of 1982 before the District Munsif Court, Tiruchengode, for declaration and injunction on 27.2.1982. On 8.10.1990, the first respondent herein/plaintiff had also filed an amendment petition seeking amendment of interim injunction into one as mandatory injunction. The said amendment petition was allowed by the trial Court which was not challenged by the appellants herein.
2. The trial Court has decreed the suit and granted declaration as prayed for by the first respondent herein/plaintiff, however, it refused to grant mandatory injunction for removal of staircase and window sunshades, but granted injunction restraining the appellants herein from interfering into the property of the plaintiff for which declaration is granted. The plaintiff had filed an appeal challenging to the extent of refusal to grant mandatory injunction in A.S.No.54 of 1991 before the Sub Court, Sankari, which was allowed. Hence, the second appeal.
3. It is the case of the appellants that the staircase and window sunshades were constructed as early as 1973. But, the same was disputed by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.