SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Mad) 969

S.JAGADEESAN
M. Babu, In re – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :A.K. Parthasarathy Advocate.

Judgment :

The contemner herein filed O.P.No.749 of 1993 for grant of Letters of Administration with a will dated 5.8.1991 executed by R.MuniMaistry alias R.Munian. Along with the said O.P., the contemner filed consent affidavits of the other legal heirs of the deceased R.Muni Maistry alias R.Munian. By order dated 21.2.1995, this Court ordered the said O.P. and issued the Letters of Administration as prayed for by the contemner herein on his executing a personal bond for Rs.1,000. Pursuant to the said order, the Letters of Administration was issued. Subsequently one of the Legal Representatives of the deceased R.Muni Maistry alias R.Munian by name M.Balachandran filed an application in Application No.872 of 1997 for revocation of the Letters of Administration on the ground that he never filed any consent affidavits in the said O.P.No.749 of 1993 and that the consent affidavit filed therein is a forged one and he did not sign any consent affidavit. On a perusal and comparison of the admitted signature as well as the signature of the said M.Balachandran in the consent affidavit, this Court found that there is lot of difference, between them and allowed the Application in Application

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top