SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 4890

K.B.K.VASUKI
Santharaju – Appellant
Versus
Chinnamma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:K. Ramachandran, Advocate.
For the Respondents:N. Manokaran, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. Both the appeals are arising out of common judgment and decree made in O.S.Nos. 808 and 781 of 1987. O.S.No. 781 of 1987 was filed by the daughter of Peter and Elizabethammal in respect of A and B schedule properties belonging to father and mother respectively, on the strength of Ex.A1 Settlement deed dated 06.06.1978 executed by father and Ex.A4 settlement deed dated 10.04.1987 executed by mother respectively in favour of the plaintiff. The suit is filed against the brothers, for the relief of permanent injunction restraining them from interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. Whereas O.S.No.808 of 1987 was filed by the daughter-in-law of Peter and Elizabethammal in respect of the same property, on the ground that the property belonged only to the father-in-law Peter and mother-in-law Elizabethammal, has no right over the same and father-in-law died, leaving behind his sons and daughter and he executed registered Will dated 05.08.1982, bequeathing the property in favour of the second son and his wife and from the date of death of father-in-law, the daughter-in-law, who is the wife of the second defendant in the other suit


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top