SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 2783

A.SELVAM
S. V. Chidambaram – Appellant
Versus
S. Sikkandhar Batcha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Subash Babu, Advocate.
For the Respondent: No appearance.

Judgment :-

The criminal revision petitioner calls in question the legality of the order dated 14.10.2003 passed in Criminal Revision Petition No.25 of 2003, by the Principal District & Sessions Court, Madurai.

2. The criminal revision respondent herein as petitioner has filed the criminal miscellaneous petition No.3929 of 2002, in C.C.No.131 of 2002, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, praying to discharge him from the proceedings of C.C.No.131 of 2002. It has been contended on the side of the petitioner therein that the respondent therein has not invoked correct provision of law in the petition filed by him. It is also stated that since civil remedy is available, the petition filed by the respondent is not legally maintainable. It is also equally stated that it is false to contend that the petitioner and other have borrowed the amount in question individually. Further, it is stated that the cheque in question has been issued only for collateral security. Under the said ground, the petitioner has filed the petition praying to discharge him from the proceeding of C.C.No.131 of 2002.

3. On the side of the respondent serious objections have been raised.

4. On the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top