PRATAP SINGH
Kalianna Kounder and others – Appellant
Versus
Marappa Kounder – Respondent
This civil revision petition and the civil miscellaneous appeal are against the orders passed in I.A.No.775 of 1991 in O.S.No.231 of 1991 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Sankari.
2. The short facts are: The respondent herein had filed the suit on a promissory note against the first revision petitioner and had also filed a petition in I.A.No.775 of 1991 for attachment before judgment. In that petition, the first petitioner in the civil revision petition who was the defendant in the suit and the second revision petitioner in C.RP.No.1638 of 1992 who was a third party in the suit, had offered the properties belonging to the second revision petitioner/third party as security. Learned Subordinate Judge had rejected it stating that the property offered by the third party as security cannot be accepted. Aggrieved by that order, C.R.P.No.1638 of 1992 is filed by the defendant as well as the third party, as revision petitioners. After rejecting the security offered by the third-party, learned Subordinate Judge, has passed an order of attachment. Aggrieved by the order of attachment before judgment, C.M.A. No.509 of 1992 is filed.
3. Mr.R.Sekar, learned counsel appearing for the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.