SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Mad) 371

SRINIVASAN, THANGAMANI
M. Subramania Mudaliar – Appellant
Versus
K. Janardhanam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.R. Gopalan, R. Gunasekar, K. Janardhanam, Advocates.

Judgment :

SRINIVASAN, J.

C.M.P. No. 9360 of 1993 :-This petition is for condonation of delay of 2, 092 days in representing the appeal in AS.SR. No. 55107 of 1987. The appeal is directed against the decree and judgment in O.S. No. 3262 of 1978 on the file of the VII Assistant Judge, City Civil, Madras. The appeal was originally presented in this Court on 6-7-1987. The papers were returned on 18-9-1987 by the Registry for rectification of certain defects. The papers bear the seal of 25-6-1993 as if they were represented on that date. There is no sort of endorsement by the counsel at the time of the alleged representation. The papers were returned by the Registry and the concerned Appeal Examiner has made an endorsement of return on that date itself. One of the returns raised a query as to how this Court is the proper forum to entertain the appeal when the value of the suit in Rs. 26, 585/-, that is below Rs. 30, 000/-. The Deputy Registrar had initialled the return and made an endorsement,

"Time 10 days for representation to proper Court."

2. The Deputy Registrar had no jurisdiction to make that order. The return was only to enquire the advocate as to how this Court was the proper














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top