Rajasuria, J.

1. This appeal is focussed as against the order passed in C.M.A.No. 111 of 2001 on the file of the District Judge, Trichy, dated 03.05.2002, in setting aside the order passed in H.M.O.P. No. 49 of 1998 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Trichy, dated 16.08.2001.

2. For convenience sake, the parties are referred to hereunder as husband and wife.

3. Both the Courts below detailed and delineated the averments as found set out in the petition as well as in the counter and reply. Even then, I am of the view that this being a matrimonial matter, it is just and necessary to broadly but briefly, narratively but precisely set out the facts thus:

The nitty-gritty, the gist and kernel of the case of the petitioner as stood exposited from the petition which was filed under Section 13(1)(i)(a) of the Hindu Marriages Act, by the husband Anand, (hereinafter referred to as the husband.) as against the respondent Indu (hereinafter referred to as the wife.) on the ground of cruelty, would run thus:

(i) Anand, and Indu, got married as per the Hindu Rites and Customs on 11.09.1995 at Trichy as arranged by the eldeRs. Within a short span of time after marriage,