High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T. RAJA
Poongavanam & Others
Versus
Thangamani & Others
Second Apppeal No.305 of 2006
Decided on : 11-01-2012
Family Pension - Validity of Second Marriage - Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, Rule 49(7)(a)(i), Rule 49(6) - The court discussed the validity of the second marriage and its impact on the entitlement to family pension under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules. It also considered the legal status of children born from a void marriage and their entitlement to share in the family pension and death-cum-retirement gratuity.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a dispute over the entitlement to family pension and other benefits between the first wife and her children and the second wife and her children following the death of a government servant. The trial court decreed the suit in favor of the second wife and her children, but the first appellate court reversed the decision, leading to the second appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the second wife's marriage to the deceased government servant was not valid in the eyes of the law, and therefore, she and her children were not entitled to any share in the family pension. However, the children of the second wife, being treated as legitimate children, were entitled to a 1/8 share in the family pension and death-cum-retirement gratuity.
Issues: The key issues revolved around the validity of the second marriage, the entitlement of the second wife and her children to family pension and other benefits, and the legal status of children born from a void marriage.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Rule 49(7)(a)(i) and Rule 49(6) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules to determine the entitlement to family pension and other benefits. It also considered the legal position that children of a void marriage are legitimate and entitled to a share in the deceased employee's benefits.
Final Decision: The second appeal was dismissed, confirming the first appellate court's decision that the second wife and her children were not entitled to family pension, but the children of the second wife were entitled to a 1/8 share in the family pension and death-cum-retirement gratuity.
1. The present second appeal has been directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.02.2005 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri at Krishangiri in A.S.No.31 of 2003 in and by which the Judgment and Decree dated 14.1.2003 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Krishnagiri in O.S.No.190 of 1997 has been reversed.
2. The brief facts which lead to file the second appeal are as follows:
(i) The suit was filed by the first wife and her children for partition of the scheduled mentioned properties into two equal shares and to allot one such share to the plaintiffs and to further direct the defendants 5 to 7/respondents 5 to 7 to pay half share of the surrender salary, family pension and the other benefits payable to late Subramani to the plaintiffs and for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants 5 to 7/respondents 5 to 7 from disbursing the amounts to the defendants 1 to 4/respondents 1 to 4.
(ii) The first plaintiff, Poongavanam is the second wife of late P. Subramaniam, who worked as Line Inspector in Tamil Nadu Electricity Board at Mathur. The plaintiffs 2 to 5 are the children born out of the marriage took place between the first plaintiff and the deceased Government servant, late Subramani. The defendants 5 to 7 namely the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board are arrayed as parties to sanction all the benefits of late P.Subrmani, namely the surrender salary, DCRG, family pension and the other benefits payable to late Subramani upon his death. It was submitted before the Courts below that the plaintiffs 2 to 5 are sons and daughters born out of the marriage took place between the first plaintiff (second wife) and the deceased Government (late Subramani) and therefore another prayer was also sought for to allot 1/8 share in all the amounts mentioned in the plaint. The trial Court after proper enquiry, decreed the suit as prayed for.
(iii) Aggrieved by the said judgment passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Krishnagiri, an appeal in A.S.No.31 of 2003 was preferred by the defendants 1 to 4 viz., the first wife/Thangamani/first defendant and her children on the ground that the marriage never took place between the first plaintiff/Poongavanam and the deceased P.Subramani, who was a Government Servant, hence, the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court granting 1/2 share to the plaintiffs 2 to 5 cannot be accepted and the same has to be set aside.
(iv) The learned first appellate Court in its finding stated that the marriage took place between the first plaintiff and the deceased P.Subramani, who was Government servant is not valid, but the children born out between them are the valid legal heirs and hence, it confirmed the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court by accepting to enjoy 1/8 share in respect of item Nos.1 to 4 i.e Family Benefit Fund, D.C.R.G, Provident Fund and Leave Salary by the plaintiffs 2 to 5 and the defendants 1 to 4 and in respect of the fifth item i.e. the Family Pension is concerned, it reversed the finding of the trial Court stating that the first defendant is entitled to get pension as she alone was a legally wedded wife. As far as the share of the schedule mentioned property is concerned, the appellate Court confirmed the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court holding that the plaintiffs 2 to 5 and the defendants 1 to 4 are entitled to 1/8th share. Against the said judgment, the second appeal has been filed.
3. Heard Mr.Shivaraman, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr.M.Govindaraj, learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.V.Viswanathan, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent Electricity Board 5 to 7.
4. At the time of admission of the above second appeal, the following substantial questions of law were framed.
i) When Rule 49(7)(a)(i) says that the family pension shall be paid to widows in equal shares and when Rule 49(7)(b) clearly says that where the deceased Government servant or pensioner is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.