1. This appeal is focussed by the first defendant in the suit, as against the judgment and decree dated 25.10.1993 passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Pondicherry, in O.S.No.650 of 1985.

2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.

3. A summation and summarisation of the relevant facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of these appeals would run thus:

The respondents 1 to 5 herein, as plaintiffs, filed the suit on various grounds, the gist and kernal of them would run thus:

(a) The property described in the plaint originally belonged to one Poulain Charele Magne Malie Maurice; he got married one Olive Claudine Laura Marie on 21.11.1900; during the wedlock, a son, namely, Poulain Andra Marie Ame'de was born to them, for nothing but to die in unmarried state, at the young age itself. Thereafter, the wife, namely, Olive Claudine Laura Marie got divorce as against her husband. Whereupon, the suit property described in the schedule of the plaint was allotted to the divorcee wife, namely, Olive Claudine Laura Marie, for her residence only and the 'Communaute' did not get disrupted or