SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 1521

High Court of Judicature at Madras
D. HARIPARANTHAMAN
P.R. Ramanathan
Versus
M.K. Ranganathan
C.S.No.466 of 2008
Decided on: 28-03-2012

Advocates appeared:
For the Plaintiff:Anand for N. Baskaran, Advocates.
For the Defendant:R. Bharath Kumar, Advocate.

Headnote:SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE - Suit in High Court for specific performance - Held, Plaintiff has not established that defendant agreed to execute the sale deed on 16-04-2008, but he failed to come to the Registrar’s office, as agreed. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the defendant, it is self serving version of the plaintiff and that during cross examination at two places, PW1 stated the date as 16-03-2008 and not 16-04-2008 as pleaded - Contention of Plaintiff that once period fixed in the contract was waived, time is not the essence of the contract and thus, the plaintiff is entitled to the relief of specific performance of contract - Rejected - Suit dismissed by High Court.

Judgment

1. The present suit is filed seeking specific performance of the sale agreement dated 07.12.2007 entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant, in respect of the suit property, directing the defendant to execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff, after receiving the balance sale consideration of Rs.33,00,000/-. An alternative prayer is made seeking direction to the defendant to refund the advance amount of Rs.10,00,000/- paid by the plaintiff in pursuant to the sale agreement dated 07.12.2007, together with interest at the rate of 24% per annum, from 07.12.2007 till the actual date of realisation.

2. The averments made by the plaintiff, in the plaint, are as follows:

(a) The suit property measuring 1500 SFT, in Survey No.335/2, "E" Type, Plot No.30, Block No.7, Phase - I, Sidco Nagar, Villivakkam, Chennai 49 was settled by the sister of the defendant, in the name of the defendant, under a registered settlement deed dated 28.03.2007, document No.1534 of 2007, registered at Sub-Registrar Office, Konnur, Chennai.

(b) An agreement dated 07.12.2007 was entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant for sale of the suit property. As per the sale agreement, the defendant agreed to sell the suit property, to the plaintiff, for a total sale consideration of Rs.43,00,000/-(Rupees Forty Three Lakhs Only).

(c) On the day of signing of sale agreement, an advance amount of Rs.10,00,000/-(Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) was paid to the defendant, by the plaintiff. It is stated in the sale agreement that the balance sale consideration of Rs.33,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Three Lakhs Only) shall be paid by the plaintiff within three months from the date of agreement. That is, the balance sale consideration shall be paid by the plaintiff, before 07.03.2008, failing which, there shall be forfeiture of a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- from the advance amount. It is also stated in the sale agreement that if the defendant fails to execute the sale deed on or before the date fixed, i.e. 07.03.2008, he shall pay an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- in addition to the advance amount of Rs.10,00,000/-, to the plaintiff. The agreement also provides that the plaintiff shall bear the expenses for the execution of the sale deed.

(d) According to the plaintiff, he repeatedly requested and demanded the defendant to receive the balance sale consideration and execute the sale deed in his favour, as per the terms of the sale agreement dated 07.12.2007, but the defendant was protracting the same, for the reasons best known to him.

(e) The plaintiff averred that he was always willing and ready to purchase the suit property and despite several requests were made by him, the defendant did not come forward to execute the sale deed in his favour.

(f) The plaintiff also averred that he requested the defendant to receive the balance sale consideration and execute the sale deed on 16.04.2008, and the defendant agreed for the same. On that day, the plaintiff made arrangements and possessed of necessary funds for payment of balance sale consideration, as per the terms of the sale agreement. However, the defendant failed to come on that day to the Registrar's office, to execute the sale deed. Hence, the plaintiff deposited the remaining sale consideration along with registration charges, in fixed deposit, in the name of the defendant, in the bank account of the plaintiff in Punjab National Bank, Anna Nagar Branch, Chennai. Hence, the present suit is filed.

3. The defendant filed written statement refuting the allegations made by the plaintiff in the plaint.

(a) The defendant admitted the execution of the sale agreement dated 07.12.2007 and also the receipt of advance amount of Rs.10,00,000/-. The defendant averred that the balance sale consideration shall be paid by the plaintiff before 07.03.2008, failing which, there would be a forfeiture of Rs.1,00,000/-from the advance amount and the defendant shall return back the balance amount of Rs.9,00,000/-to the plaintiff. If th










































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top