1. These two appeals are focussed by the defendants as against the common judgment and decrees dated 30.11.2005 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, [Fast Track Court No.I] Chennai in O.S.Nos.12891 and 12960 of 1996 respectively.

2. The parties are referred to here under according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.

3. A summation and summarisation of the relevant facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of these two appeals would run thus:

The plaintiffs filed two suits, relating to one big property, by citing almost each half of it in the suits with the following prayer:

O.S.No.12891 of 1996:

“to pass judgment and decree as against the defendants-

a] declaring that the sale deed executed by the defendants 1 to 17 to and in favour of 18th defendant under registered document No.1028/95 dated 01.09.1995 of the suit property belong to the Chetpet Subbadramma Trust, bearing Old Door No.34 and New No.48, now combined as No.20, Ramakrishnan Street, Madras-1 is null and void and bogus;

b] granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, servants and all those act under their dir