1. Heard. These three miscellaneous applications came to be filed under peculiar circumstances of the case. The main writ petition being W.P.No.2116 of 2011 came to be posted before this court on being specially ordered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice vide order dated 7.3.2011 and the matter was heard and disposed of on 7.4.2011 after hearing all parties.

2. In the operative portion of the said judgment (since reported in 2011 (2) CTC 776 = 2011 (8) MLJ 234), in paragraph 56, it was ordered as follows:

“56.) In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with the following direction:

a) The third respondent is hereby directed to appoint a retired Judicial Officer not below the rank of District Judge to conduct an enquiry against the fifth respondent in respect of the complaints received from the students, parents as well as Parents Teachers' Association within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order and take further action on the fifth respondent on the basis of the report.

b) The third respondent is hereby directed to constitute a special committee as directed in Vishaka's case (cited supra) and enquire into the complaints of