SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Mad) 472

M.NATESAN
Kuppa Bai – Appellant
Versus
A. Rajagopal Nadar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M. Natesan, J.

1. The second appeal and civil revision petition are by the plaintiff, for vacant possession of land within the limits of the City, for arrears of rent, damages for use and occupation and incidental reliefs, from the 1st defendant in the suit, whose tenancy has been terminated by a notice to quit, and from the 2nd defendant who claimed under the 1st defendant. The land as a vacant site had been leased by the plaintiff to the 1st defendant's husband in 1953. The 1st defendant's husband had put up a superstructure on the land and was running a firewood business there. The first defendant's husband died during his tenancy and the 1st defendant continued in occupation convenanting with the plaintiff for a lease for a period of three years. This agreement for lease between the plaintiff and the 1st defendant is found recorded in the unregistered, document Exhibit A-8 dated 26th February, 1956. The earlier lease is also by an unregistered rental agreement between the plaintiff and the 1st defendant's husband, Exhbit A-1 dated 25th February, 1953. Under Exhibit A-9 dated 5th May, 1960, the plaintiff issued notice to the 1st defendant terminating her tenancy with the


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top