SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Mad) 769

A.S.ANAND, D.J.JAGANNADHA RAJU
Association of University Teachers – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Raju, J.

1. These batches of cases, some writ petitions as well as writ appeals, are taken up for consideration together since they involve identical questions of law and common submissions have been made by counsel appearing on either side. The consideration of some of these cases individually on merits will ultimetely depend upon the decision that we render on the legal issues.

2. The constitutional validity of Sections 2(7), 11, 24(3) and 32 of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976 is being questioned by the respective petitioners in the above proceedings. The facts that all the educational institutions involved in the these proceedings are minority institutions and they get 100% State aid in respect of teaching grant and 80% in respect of non-teaching grant and all of them are affiliated to one or the other Universities within the State of Tamil Nadu are beyond controversy.

3. The Government of Tamil Nadu decided to regulate the conditions of service of teachers employed in private colleges and to make the necessary law relating to the managing bodies and of payment of grants to such colleges by means of an appropriate statute. As prelude, the Tamil Nad




















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top