SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 1298

V.S.SIRPURKAR
U. Palani – Appellant
Versus
Registrar, Annamalai University – Respondent


JUDGMENT

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.

1. This writ appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge whereby, the claim of the petitioner for enhancement of his pension by adding his earlier services in various other institutions to his qualifying service was refused.

2. Petitioner retired from the post of Lecturer in Tamil in Annamalai University on 6.5.1979. Once his pension was fixed, he not being satisfied with that pension, represented to the University that his earlier service rendered as Lecturer in other educational institutions should also be counted as qualifying service for the purpose of computation of his pension. He calculated the total service to be 26 years, 10 months and 15 days whereas, as per the University, his qualifying service was calculated at 10 years, 10 months and 17 days only. Petitioner based his claim on the resolution passed by the University in a meeting held on 29.11.1980, whereby Statute 3(ii) was amended so as to count as qualifying service the service rendered by a teacher under all managements previously, viz., Government, Local Bodies, Aided Colleges, High Schools and Technical Educational Institutions before entering the University servic




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top